لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
In accordance with the EPA price schedule, the request should be limited in scope, instead of be meant for redistribution around the internet or for commercial purposes.
These lists are sorted chronologically by Chief Justice and include things like all notable cases decided through the court. Articles exist for almost all cases.
During the dynamic realm of legal statutes, amendments Participate in a vital role in adapting to evolving circumstances and strengthening the legal framework. One such notable amendment that has garnered attention may be the latest revision of Section 489-F in the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC).
94 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It truly is well-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within ninety days. If the appeal will not be decided within that timeframe, he/she can then solution the service tribunal to challenge the original order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, given that the ninety days for that department to act has already expired. Around the aforesaid proposition, we are guided with the decision from the Supreme Court from the case of Dr.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to your main case, it is also a properly-proven proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is topic towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings about the evidence.
The reason for this difference is that these civil legislation jurisdictions adhere to a tradition that the reader should have the capacity to deduce the logic from the decision and also the statutes.[four]
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
The regulation as established in previous court rulings; like common regulation, which springs from judicial decisions and tradition.
This case has here become cited in many subsequent judgments, particularly in cases involving constitutional legislation, judicial independence, along with the rule of law.
Preserving Social Order: By imposing strict penalties for murder, Section 302 PPC reinforces the principle of social order and balance. It demonstrates the commitment on the state to protect its citizens and copyright the rule of regulation.
this Court is remaining with no option but to direct the respondents to inform the promotion from the petitioner in next rank .(Promotion)
The latest amendment to this section signifies the legislature’s dedication to maximizing the effectiveness on the regulation in tackling contemporary challenges related to counterfeiting.
The residents argued that the high-voltage grid station would pose a health risk and opportunity hazard to local residents. In the long run, the court determined the scientific evidence inconclusive, even though observing the general trend supports that electromagnetic fields have detrimental effects on human health. The Court accepted the petitioner’s argument that it should adopt the precautionary principle established out inside the 1992 Rio Declaration around the Environment and Advancement, the first international instrument that linked environment protection with human rights, whereby The shortage of full scientific certainty should not be used being a reason to prevent environmental degradation.